SMOKING GUN: Declassified Durham Annex Confirms Hillary Clinton Orchestrated Russia Hoax to Distract from Email Scandal (Screenshot)
A newly declassified annex from Special Counsel John Durham’s investigation has confirmed the explosive truth many Americans suspected all along: Hillary Clinton personally approved the plan to fabricate the Trump-Russia collusion hoax in order to distract from her own email scandal.
The once-hidden document reveals in black and white that Clinton’s campaign intentionally devised a scheme to smear Donald Trump by falsely tying him to Russian hacking in the 2016 election. The goal, according to the annex, was clear—“to distract from her missing emails” and to “demonize Trump.”
Among the smoking gun lines in the declassified annex:
“HRC approved Julia’s idea about Trump and Russian hackers…”
“The point is making the Russian play a U.S. domestic issue.”
“Later, the FBI will put more oil on the fire.”
Screenshot of the annex:
This wasn’t a careless political move—it was a calculated deep state operation. Clinton’s team, along with high-level government players, used the U.S. intelligence community as a political weapon. They manufactured a false narrative, unleashed it on the American public, and lit the fuse for years of investigations and division—all to cover her own tracks.
According to reports, Clinton’s scheme wasn’t just approved; it was embraced. And the FBI? Rather than stop it, they stoked it further, feeding the fire with leaks and politically charged investigations.
“Hillary put this out knowing it was all a setup that she was involved in. Arrest Hillary,” conservative influencer Catturd2 posted in reaction to the bombshell.
It’s now clearer than ever: Trump wasn’t the threat to democracy—they were.
Where is the justice? Where are the arrests? And how long will the media ignore this damning evidence?
Mark Van der Veen offers some of the most analytical and insightful writings on politics. He regularly opines on the motives and political calculations of politicians and candidates, and whether or not their strategy will work. Van der Veen offers a contrast to many on this list by sticking mainly to a fact-based style of writing that is generally combative with opposing ideologies.
