Shocking Affidavit: Whistleblower Reveals Harris Campaign Controlled Debate Questions, Secret Recordings Confirm Everything (Screenshots)

In a shocking development, a whistleblower from ABC News has come forward, swearing under penalty of perjury that the Kamala Harris campaign directly controlled the terms of the questions during the presidential debate. Even more disturbing, the Harris campaign allegedly demanded live “fact-checking” of President Donald Trump during the debate—a request ABC apparently obliged, without holding Harris to the same standard.

The whistleblower, whose identity remains protected, signed an affidavit in New York detailing how ABC News executives allowed Harris’s campaign to dictate the rules of engagement for the debate. According to the document, Trump was fact-checked at least five times, while Harris was not checked a single time, despite making several debunked statements, including repeating the notorious “fine people” hoax and the “bloodbath” hoax.
Notarized document:

This individual claims to have secret recordings that will reveal how ABC News manipulated the event to favor the Democratic candidate. These recordings have not yet been made public, but the whistleblower has sent a copy of the notarized affidavit to Speaker Mike Johnson, amplifying concerns that election interference took place at the highest levels of media and politics.

This unprecedented admission could have a profound impact on the public’s trust in the media. With ABC News now facing serious allegations of rigging the debate, it is clear that this is not just a minor scandal—it’s a massive breach of journalistic ethics and potentially illegal election interference.

Calls for transparency and accountability are growing louder, with many demanding that the recordings be released immediately to show how deeply involved the Harris campaign was in controlling the narrative. The evidence, if proven true, paints a damning picture of a media establishment working hand-in-hand with political campaigns to skew public perception and influence the outcome of elections.

Mark Van der Veen

Mark Van der Veen offers some of the most analytical and insightful writings on politics. He regularly opines on the motives and political calculations of politicians and candidates, and whether or not their strategy will work. Van der Veen offers a contrast to many on this list by sticking mainly to a fact-based style of writing that is generally combative with opposing ideologies.

www.rightjournalism.com/