Last week liberal media made a huge deal about the fact that Trump allegedly called some third world countries a “s***hole” while he was discussing a deal with top lawmakers for recipients of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, known as DACA.
Media and Democrats claimed that Trump’s alleged comments were racist in nature. On Sunday evening, Trump defended himself as “the least racist person you have ever interviewed.”
“No, no, I’m not a racist,” he told reporters as he headed to a dinner at his Palm Beach Golf Club with House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy.
And on Tuesday morning, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was asked about Trump’s comments, and her response absolutely obliterated the argument:
“Look, I think that it is an outrageous claim, and frankly, I think if the critics of the president were who he said he was, why did NBC give him a show for a decade on TV? Why did Chuck Schumer and all his colleagues come and beg Donald Trump for money?
If they are who they try to portray him as, why did they want to be with him for years and years in various activities, whether it was events and fundraisers and other things. I think it’s just an outrageous and ludicrous excuse, and they need to get on board and start actually doing what they were elected to do.”
As I see it from here, the plan is to call him racist so he will capitulate on DACA. They keep trying old tactics that have worked on past Republicans. Trump is not George W Bush or George HW Bush and thanks God for that.
It’s really sad when your narrative is to shout the other side down with baseless accusations, but then a competent, intelligent woman throws a few facts your way, and you have to retreat to make up something else that’ll get you smacked down yet again.
What do you think? Scroll down to leave a comment below!
Natalie Dagenhardt is an American conservative writer who writes for Right Journalism! Natalie has described herself as a polemicist who likes to “stir up the pot,” and does not “pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do,” drawing criticism from the left, and sometimes from the right. As a passionate journalist, she works relentlessly to uncover the corruption happening in Washington. She is a “constitutional conservative”.