Stormy Daniels’ attorney, Michael Avenatti is desperately trying to stay relevant. This is why he expressed his opinion about exploiting illegal immigrant children who may be separated from their parents at the border. A few days ago he posted a photo of a crying girl and wrote: “This is what Mr. Trump and Mr. Miller’s immigration policy really looks like…”
This is what Mr. Trump and Mr. Miller's immigration policy really looks like… pic.twitter.com/hmWY1lSWSd
— Michael Avenatti (@MichaelAvenatti) June 24, 2018
Does Avenatti really think anyone cares what he thinks? He is good at propaganda but most see right past you’re nonsense. Luckily, actor James Woods delivered a blistering response to Michael Avenatti tweet about illegal immigration!
Woods wrote: “Your fifteen minutes are beyond over. Why don’t you and DeRay and Hogg all have dinner together and talk about the glory days. You’re all the chum of history.”
Your fifteen minutes are beyond over. Why don’t you and DeRay and Hogg all have dinner together and talk about the glory days. You’re all the chum of history. https://t.co/R51OT2DodR
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) June 28, 2018
Awesome response. This will remind Avenatti to stick to what he knows, which is tanking companies, getting sued for withholding taxes and representing porn stars.
I am so thankful that James Woods represents the logical, well-informed American patriotic trying to do right for our great nation. James Woods is a true patriot and speaks for many who don’t have a voice.
What do you think? Scroll down to leave a comment below!
Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share with your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family.
Natalie Dagenhardt is an American conservative writer who writes for Right Journalism! Natalie has described herself as a polemicist who likes to “stir up the pot,” and does not “pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do,” drawing criticism from the left, and sometimes from the right. As a passionate journalist, she works relentlessly to uncover the corruption happening in Washington. She is a “constitutional conservative”.