Here Is DNI Gabbard Earlier This Year With a Warning That Most of the MSM Considered a Joke – Well Nobody Is Smiling Now After It Came True! (Video)
You have to wonder how many times the mainstream media’s smug dismissal of a warning comes back to bite them in the backside, but Tulsi Gabbard’s early 2025 alert about radical Muslims slipping into the country unvetted under Biden is a textbook case. As the newly confirmed Director of National Intelligence, Gabbard stood at a podium in her signature cap and button-down, laying it out plain: the Biden admin’s porous borders let in potential threats without proper screening, and we need to take it seriously. “The threats to our Constitution aren’t just coming from abroad, but from right here at home,” she said, flanked by mics and a stern-faced colleague, her expression all business.
Video:
Back then, outlets like CNN and MSNBC chuckled it off as Gabbard’s “conspiracy theory” or “MAGA paranoia,” painting her as the unhinged former Democrat turned Trump pick. Fast-forward to November 2025, and nobody’s laughing after the FBI’s Dearborn bust—ISIS-inspired plotters arrested in the largest Muslim-majority city in America, planning a Halloween massacre. Gabbard’s words weren’t hyperbole; they were a heads-up on the very risks Biden’s open-door policy ignored, letting over 10 million migrants flood in with minimal vetting.
It’s infuriating how the MSM prioritizes narrative over facts—dismissing Gabbard as a joke while downplaying the Dearborn suspects’ ties to online radicalization. She warned of unvetted entries fueling extremism, and here we are, with plots in our backyard. The left’s silence now? Deafening, as always—they’d rather attack Gabbard than admit the disaster.
This is why her confirmation mattered: a DNI who calls it like she sees it, not some yes-man. Voters, midterms are your chance to hold the media accountable—demand truth, not spin.
Mark Van der Veen offers some of the most analytical and insightful writings on politics. He regularly opines on the motives and political calculations of politicians and candidates, and whether or not their strategy will work. Van der Veen offers a contrast to many on this list by sticking mainly to a fact-based style of writing that is generally combative with opposing ideologies.
