CNN Reporter Tries Discrediting Nick Shirley with Calls – It Didn’t Go Well at All! (Video)
After Nick Shirley’s on-the-ground videos exposing suspicious activity at Somali-run daycare centers in Minneapolis went viral, the media response followed a painfully familiar script. Instead of seriously investigating the allegations or reviewing publicly available evidence from past prosecutions, the left-wing press immediately went after the messenger. Predictably, CNN personalities rushed to blame racism, Trump supporters, and “right-wing misinformation” — anything except the possibility that large-scale fraud might actually be happening.
So CNN finally decided to “investigate.” But not the fraud.
They investigated **Nick Shirley**.
In a now-viral clip, a CNN reporter attempts to undermine Shirley’s reporting by making phone calls to daycare centers featured in his videos, seemingly hoping to prove everything was on the up-and-up. The plan? Catch Shirley exaggerating or fabricating claims. The reality? The calls went unanswered — repeatedly — and the entire stunt blew up in CNN’s face.
Instead of debunking anything, the segment only reinforced what Shirley and others have been pointing out for years: many of these daycare locations appear to exist largely on paper, were unreachable, or showed signs consistent with previously prosecuted fraud schemes in Minnesota. CNN didn’t expose a hoax — they accidentally confirmed the problem.
And rather than asking *why* these facilities couldn’t be reached, or why Minnesota has a long, documented history of daycare fraud investigations dating back nearly a decade, CNN focused on tone policing and character attacks. That’s not journalism — that’s narrative protection.
Video:
This is the same network that routinely assures viewers everything is fine as long as the “right people” say so. CNN would probably tour North Korea and report that everything’s great because Kim Jong-un smiled for the camera. If this network existed during World War II, they’d be waiting for Goebbels to confirm whether anything suspicious was happening.
The irony is rich: CNN finally goes to Minnesota, not to verify fraud, but to discredit the guy filming it — and ends up strengthening his case.
The only exception at CNN remains Scott Jennings, who consistently pushes back against the anti-Trump groupthink and actually asks uncomfortable questions. The rest of the network? A masterclass in how *not* to do journalism.
Watch the video and decide for yourself. CNN tried to make Nick Shirley the story — and instead exposed their own utter lack of credibility.
Mark Van der Veen offers some of the most analytical and insightful writings on politics. He regularly opines on the motives and political calculations of politicians and candidates, and whether or not their strategy will work. Van der Veen offers a contrast to many on this list by sticking mainly to a fact-based style of writing that is generally combative with opposing ideologies.
