Political Watch

Mark Meadows Just Released the SAVE Act Senate Scorecard – Who’s Backing the Standing Filibuster & Who’s Still Missing?

You know that moment when the swamp starts sweating because real patriots are putting names and numbers on their betrayal? That’s exactly what just happened when former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows released the official SAVE Act Senate scorecard on X, laying bare which Republican senators are standing with President Trump and which RINOs are still dragging their feet on the most important election integrity bill in a generation.

Meadows made it crystal clear:
“I’m going to keep posting our whip count so America knows which senators are supportive of passing the SAVE America Act via standing filibuster. As promised, I’ll update this list daily as more senators join the fight.”

Here are the Republican senators who have already publicly signaled support for passing the SAVE Act through a standing filibuster:

– Jim Banks (IN)
– Marsha Blackburn (TN)
– Ted Budd (NC)
– Katie Britt (AL)
– Bill Cassidy (LA)
– John Cornyn (TX)
– Ted Cruz (TX)
– Joni Ernst (IA)
– Bill Hagerty (TN)
– Josh Hawley (MO)
– Ron Johnson (WI)
– Mike Lee (UT)
– Cynthia Lummis (WY)
– Roger Marshall (KS)
– Dave McCormick (PA)
– Ashley Moody (FL)
– Bernie Moreno (OH)
– Markwayne Mullin (OK)
– Rand Paul (KY)
– Jim Risch (ID)
– Eric Schmitt (MO)
– Rick Scott (FL)
– Tim Sheehy (MT)
– Dan Sullivan (AK)
– Tommy Tuberville (AL)

But then Meadows turned up the heat on the MISSING IN ACTION crew — the RINOs who have not yet publicly supported the standing filibuster strategy:

– John Barrasso (WY)
– John Boozman (AR)
– Shelley Moore Capito (WV)
– Susan Collins (ME)
– Tom Cotton (AR)
– Kevin Cramer (ND)
– Mike Crapo (ID)
– John Curtis (UT)
– Steve Daines (MT)
– Deb Fischer (NE)
– Lindsey Graham (SC)
– Chuck Grassley (IA)
– John Hoeven (ND)
– Jim Justice (WV)
– John Kennedy (LA)
– James Lankford (OK)
– Mitch McConnell (KY)
– Jerry Moran (KS)
– Lisa Murkowski (AK)
– Pete Ricketts (NE)
– Tim Scott (SC)
– John Thune (SD)
– Thom Tillis (NC)
– Roger Wicker (MS)
– Todd Young (IN)

Meadows’ message to these holdouts is clear: the American people are watching, and they’re not going to forget who stood with Trump and who stood with the swamp. The SAVE America Act is the most important bill the U.S. Senate could ever pass — it requires proof of citizenship to vote in federal elections, closes the loopholes that allow non-citizens to interfere in our democracy, and is supported by overwhelming majorities of Americans (including 85% who agree only U.S. citizens should vote). Yet establishment RINOs like John Thune and Mitch McConnell are still blocking it, refusing to nuke the filibuster and admitting the GOP is “not unified.”

This scorecard is a wake-up call. The pressure campaign is real, grassroots, and bipartisan — not some “paid influencer ecosystem” as Thune tried to dismiss it. Polls show 71–85% support across parties for voter ID, proof of citizenship, and purging non-citizens from voter rolls. The American people want secure elections — not excuses from RINOs.

Trump has already put the Senate on notice: no other bills get signed until the SAVE Act hits his desk. Ken Paxton has offered to drop his Senate run if the filibuster is lifted and the bill passes. Meadows is now putting daily public pressure on the holdouts. The ball is in the Senate GOP’s court — pass the SAVE Act or face the consequences.

Patriots, time to flood these senators’ offices with calls and emails. Demand they get on board. The future of fair elections depends on it.

Whatfinger News is a premier conservative news aggregator, serving as an alternative to sites like Drudge Report. It provides a comprehensive collection of links to the latest headlines, videos, and stories from various sources, keeping readers up-to-date on current events with a focus on alternative and right-leaning perspectives.

Mark Van der Veen

Mark Van der Veen offers some of the most analytical and insightful writings on politics. He regularly opines on the motives and political calculations of politicians and candidates, and whether or not their strategy will work. Van der Veen offers a contrast to many on this list by sticking mainly to a fact-based style of writing that is generally combative with opposing ideologies.

Send this to a friend