Opinion & DebatePolitical Watch

BREAKING: DOJ and FBI Admit They’re Still “Locating” Epstein Records—Judicial Watch Lawsuit Blows It Wide Open

The Epstein saga is far from over—and now, thanks to Judicial Watch, we know the Department of Justice and the FBI are still scrambling to “locate” key records related to the disgraced financier and alleged sex trafficker.

Despite issuing public statements claiming there is no client list, no blackmail evidence, and no reason for further disclosure, the agencies are now backpedaling under oath. According to Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton, “They are sending out contradictory messages: telling the American people that no Epstein material will be released, while telling the federal court… that the Epstein FOIA review is proceeding.”

The revelation came in court filings from an ongoing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit launched by Judicial Watch, which has relentlessly pursued the truth about Epstein’s connections to powerful figures and possible intelligence ties.

“This is a classic case of bureaucratic gaslighting,” Fitton said. “If there’s truly nothing to hide, why the delays? Why the contradictions?”

It’s the latest in a growing list of inconsistencies surrounding the Epstein investigation. While the DOJ claims Epstein’s death was a suicide and insists there’s “no evidence” of a client list, Americans are asked to take their word for it—even as the agencies admit behind closed doors that the records search isn’t finished.

Meanwhile, the precedent exists for full disclosure. The JFK Records Act led to massive declassifications when there was political will. What’s stopping it here?

With the DOJ and FBI contradicting themselves in public and in court, it’s no wonder trust in federal law enforcement continues to crater. Until all documents are released—without redactions, without delays—skepticism is more than warranted. It’s necessary.

The American people deserve the truth. Not another cover-up.

Mark Van der Veen

Mark Van der Veen offers some of the most analytical and insightful writings on politics. He regularly opines on the motives and political calculations of politicians and candidates, and whether or not their strategy will work. Van der Veen offers a contrast to many on this list by sticking mainly to a fact-based style of writing that is generally combative with opposing ideologies.

5 1 vote
Article Rating
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Dave
Dave
1 year ago

As many speculate, this turn around is due the nature of crime being so far beyond the comprehension of the good people of the US. Think back to the release of the JFK assassination, the CIA, FBI and LBJ all knew the truth; not a theory but a fact. People yawned at the revelation.
But what if there are supernatural elements to the case that go far beyond any sci-fi horror film imaginable – what if it can be shown that it is all demonically supernatural? Now connect the dots – Where does supernatural demonization come from? The Bible tells us!
Ephesians 6:10-18 About a powerful supernatural enemy that requires everything God has given us to defend against it.

In other words, If it is so beyond our human abilities to defend against – how do we do so?

The answer lies in the Bible – and that will NEVER EVER be acknowledged by a world ruled by the most evil supernatural entity ever created or to live in all the universe.

LtJ
LtJ
1 year ago

Yeah, and there is hamburger all over the highway in the middle of Missouri from an overturned cattle truck and the Moon is really mad of Cheese!

Brianroy
Brianroy
1 year ago

Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Document 4 Filed 10/03/16
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4524664/doe-v-trump/
Jane Doe v. DONALD J. TRUMP and
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
alleges that Trump raped a 13 year old girl in 1994, taking her virginity, tying her to a bed & slapping her open hand to the face & then raping her and that Trump declared on 2 occasions he knew Epstein personally for 7 years as of 1994 & ,(New York, 10/28/02, “’I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,’’ (P. 4 .9 of Court Document) Plaintiff alleges Epstein also raped her and that he was upset Trump removed her virginity 1st, or words to this effect.
Maybe this is what Trump does not want to come out? That he knew Epstein intimately and is as dirty as others who went to a remote island to do the same years later? Just asking.

IDKIDCIDGAF
IDKIDCIDGAF
1 year ago

Anyone besides me notice that every time there’s something to hide…something horrendous…Trump ALWAYS trots out a blonde floozy? Apparently he thinks they’re the solution to all life’s problems…but they have a shelf life.

IDKIDCIDGAF
IDKIDCIDGAF
1 year ago

Prolly shoulda said this first, but GOD BLESS TOM FITTON !!!

D3F1ANT
D3F1ANT
1 year ago

They’re all a bunch of Globalist liars. Patel and Bondi (and Bongino) are no better than Sessions and Barr and Wray.