They Never Learn: For the Third Time, Rioters Try Stopping a Car at Newark ICE — The Hardest Hit Sends One Flying (Video)
Leftist rioters at the Newark ICE facility just got another painful lesson in reality.
For the third time since these protests began, activists tried jumping in front of a moving vehicle to block it from leaving the facility. This time, the driver didn’t stop. He hit the gas.
The impact was the hardest yet. One rioter went flying while the others got slammed to the pavement. Reports say they were quickly crying out for “medic!” after learning the hard way that standing in front of a moving car is a terrible idea.
Video:
These protesters have been blocking exits, surrounding vehicles, and trying to physically stop people from coming and going. In previous incidents, drivers were forced to stop or navigate around them. This time, the driver made a different choice — and the rioters paid the price.
Jumping in front of a moving car is reckless and dangerous. These activists seem to believe they can intimidate drivers into stopping or that their “protest” gives them some kind of right to physically obstruct traffic. Reality keeps proving otherwise.
This latest incident shows the pattern clearly. The same tactics, the same entitlement, and the same painful results. They never learn. Blocking roads, surrounding buildings, and trying to stop vehicles isn’t peaceful protest — it’s obstruction and a direct threat to public safety.
Drivers have every right to keep moving when someone deliberately steps in front of their car. The law doesn’t require you to stop for people who are intentionally creating a hazard.
The rioters at Newark ICE have been escalating for days. This time, the consequences were swift and visible. Maybe the next group will think twice before playing human roadblock.
Actions have consequences. Standing in front of a moving vehicle is one of the dumbest ways to learn that lesson.
—
Mark Van der Veen offers some of the most analytical and insightful writings on politics. He regularly opines on the motives and political calculations of politicians and candidates, and whether or not their strategy will work. Van der Veen offers a contrast to many on this list by sticking mainly to a fact-based style of writing that is generally combative with opposing ideologies.
