“Frame This For Future Generations: This California Ballot “Counted As a Vote” — A Perfect Exhibit for the Museum of Clown World”
This is the kind of thing that belongs behind glass in the Museum of Clown World.
A California ballot that was officially counted as a valid vote features a big smiley face drawn in the signature area instead of an actual signature.
Ballot:

No printed name. No cursive signature. Just a happy little smiley face — and it still got counted.
This perfectly captures the state of “election integrity” in parts of California right now. While regular voters are expected to follow the rules, some ballots appear to sail through with the bare minimum (or less) of verification. A smiley face as a signature? In any sane system, that should be rejected instantly. Instead, it was accepted and added to the total.
This comes at a time when we’ve already seen massive late ballot drops with highly suspicious patterns — including one where a candidate received zero votes out of over 24,000 ballots despite polling strongly beforehand. The combination of loose verification standards, extended counting periods, and ballots like this one makes it harder and harder for people to trust the process.
California turned voting into a weeks-long ordeal with mail-in ballots, drop boxes, and relaxed rules. The result is exactly what you’d expect: more opportunities for sloppiness, errors, and outright abuse. Meanwhile, anyone who questions these outcomes gets lectured by the media about “misinformation.”
A smiley face ballot being counted isn’t a small glitch. It’s a symptom of a broken system that prioritizes access over security. Voters deserve real safeguards — proof of citizenship, strict ID requirements, firm deadlines, and signature verification that actually means something.
This ballot should be framed and displayed as a warning. Future generations need to see how far things slipped when common sense was thrown out the window in the name of “democracy.”
The fight for election integrity isn’t over. Cases like this make it crystal clear why it’s so necessary.
—
Natalie Dagenhardt is an American conservative writer who writes for Right Journalism! Natalie has described herself as a polemicist who likes to “stir up the pot,” and does not “pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do,” drawing criticism from the left, and sometimes from the right. As a passionate journalist, she works relentlessly to uncover the corruption happening in Washington. She is a “constitutional conservative”.

That pretty well sums up Americas thirst for socialism. Y’all going to be sorry when you finally get your wish though. No digging yourself out of that big hole either. It’ll take the blood of innocents to wash that stain away at some point.
While there are a great number of useful idiots, the move to socialism is not an American thirst. It comes from globalists, outside influences. Euro oligarchs would love to see the US in the same decline as Europe.
I don’t think the smiley face is the issue with this ballot. It is, after all, a mark. The issue I see as invalidating is that the name of the witness is not printed above the signature line. I would like to see those overseeing the process call this person to cure their ballot and if they show up, follow them. Pull on the thread and see where it leads.
Which also makes me wonder if they are getting any good information from the LA woman who was arrested for paying homeless people to vote using her own address. There must be a large number of people involved and organized in harvesting and returning illegitimate ballots. Prison for all of them.