Rainbow Activist Tells Citizen Journalist to Carry ID — Her Brain Glitches When Asked About Voter ID (Video)
A rainbow activist got into it with a citizen journalist on the street and demanded he carry some kind of badge or ID to identify himself while asking questions. The conversation took a quick turn when he flipped the script and asked her a simple follow-up about voter ID.
Video:
She had been screeching about how he needed to prove who he was, but when the topic shifted to whether voters should have to show ID at the polls, her response turned into a classic case of selective standards. The activist suddenly seemed unwilling or unable to apply the same logic consistently.
Citizen journalists operating in public spaces aren’t legally required to carry press badges or government-issued ID in most situations. They’re regular people exercising their First Amendment rights by recording and asking questions in open areas. Activists on the other side of these encounters often have no problem doxxing or targeting individuals they disagree with, yet they suddenly want identification rules when the camera is pointed at them.
The real hypocrisy shines through in the contrast. The activist wanted one person on the street to identify himself just for asking questions she didn’t have to answer. At the same time, the idea of requiring millions of people to prove they’re legally eligible to vote — and help decide who runs the country — apparently causes a mental short circuit.
Voter ID is basic election security. It’s common sense in most democracies and already required for countless other everyday activities like buying alcohol, boarding a plane, or opening a bank account. Opposing it while demanding ID from a random person with a camera reveals a clear double standard. One rule for thee when it’s inconvenient, and a different rule when it protects the process that actually matters.
The video captures the moment perfectly. The activist went from demanding identification to struggling with the logical extension of her own point. These kinds of interactions keep popping up because the underlying position doesn’t hold up under basic scrutiny. If ID is necessary for something as minor as street questioning, it’s hard to argue it shouldn’t apply to something as important as casting a ballot.
The citizen journalist simply pointed out the inconsistency. The activist’s reaction spoke louder than any long-winded explanation could.
—
Mark Van der Veen offers some of the most analytical and insightful writings on politics. He regularly opines on the motives and political calculations of politicians and candidates, and whether or not their strategy will work. Van der Veen offers a contrast to many on this list by sticking mainly to a fact-based style of writing that is generally combative with opposing ideologies.
